Multiple pay

COA bares N. Vizcaya fund ‘scam’

BAYOMBONG, Nueva Vizcaya–The Commission on Audit has chided the provincial government here over the alleged illegal granting of honorarium and incentives to officials, which has bled government coffers some P4.6 million in the past two years.

In its 2006 audit report, the COA noted that provincial officials continued to illegally award themselves monthly allowances and other benefits despite earlier warning to stop the practice.

Records revealed that officials and employees who comprise the province’s bids and awards committee (BAC), local finance committee (LFC) and the provincial school board (PSB), have been illegally receiving additional monthly honorarium and “year-end performance incentives” since 2005.

Virgilio Mapalad, COA audit team leader, said the provincial government should stop the payments and compel the recipients to refund the amounts they have received, reiterating its recommendation in its 2005 report.

The questioned payments were issue notices of disallowance, but these were apparently ignored and the illegal practice continued, the report said.

In 2006, the unauthorized payments of honoraria reached P2.2 million, while 2.4 million was spent for the same purpose in the preceding year.

The 2005 report was the basis of Board Member Patricio Dumlao Jr. in filing graft charges against 40 officials and employees who received P10,000 and P5,000 as “extra bonus”. The case remains pending before the Office of the Ombudsman, sources said.

Three takes

Audit documents showed that illegally-paid honoraria and bonuses were given to practically the same group of officials who manage the finances of the provincial government.

Three chiefs of offices–provincial treasurer Perfecto Martinez Jr., then provincial administrator Epifanio Galima Jr. and personnel office chief Maria Carla Torralba–thrice received their honoraria and yearend bonuses as members of the LFC, BAC and PSB, documents showed.

This is aside from their salaries and the P30,000 “cash gift” that was given to all provincial employees in December 2006.

Eight other officials, mostly chiefs of offices, twice received additional honorarium and incentives for their membership in two bodies, likewise aside from their regular pay and the P30,000 bonus.

Mapalad said the granting of fixed monthly honoraria to BAC and its technical working group (TWG), amounting to P1.3 million, was in violation of a budget circular that allows such grant only for every successful transaction completed by the BAC through competitive bidding.

In 2006, LFC members likewise illegally received a total of P337,800 in honoraria and bonuses, which was based on a “misplaced” application of a circular from the Department of Budget and Management, the COA said.

The payment of honoraria under this order, it was learned, is allowed only as compensation for a special project which required tasks beyond the employees’ regular functions, and should be undertaken has a time frame of at least a month.

No pay

The granting of additional compensation to the 10-member PSB and its TWG, totaling P450,000 was likewise made “without legal basis”, the report added.

Under the Local Government Code, officers and members of local school boards “shall perform their duties as such without compensation or remuneration”.

According to the report, the amount spent for the PSB’s unauthorized honorarium was illegally drawn from the special education fund (SEF) which is mainly intended for the construction, repair and upkeep of public schools, printing of textbooks or payment of teachers’ salaries.

This writer tried but failed to reach Gov. Luisa Cuaresma for comment. Trifena Abad, her secretary, said the governor is in Manila for an official business.

But provincial treasurer Martinez, also LFC chair, said the provincial government still has an option to respond to the COA report and justify the payments questioned therein.

“(Giving of honoraria) has been the practice even in the past administrations. I am surprised why it is only now that the COA came up with these observations,” he said.

Martinez said the COA never issued any notice of disallowance for the payment of honoraria in 2005.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s